Bibliographic Software Comparison Chart
Bibliographic software programs help users:
-
- import citations from databases, websites, and library catalogs
- create bibliographies in most output styles
- format citations for papers
- manage, categorize, and organize citations
- attach PDF's, images, etc to citations in your collection and add notes to any citation(s)
This comparison chart gives you a brief overview of the main features of several bibliographic software programs.
| RefWorks | EndNote | EndNote Web* |
ProCite |
Connotea |
CiteULike |
Zotero |
||
| Access | ||||||||
| Web Based |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
| Must be online to use |
Yes | No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|
| Cost |
Free** |
$$ |
Free |
$$ |
Free |
Free |
Free |
|
| Adding References |
||||||||
| Import from online databases | Yes |
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Yes |
Yes | |
| Import web pages | Yes | No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
Import data from RSS feeds |
Yes | No | No | No | Yes |
No |
Yes | |
|
Utilize NYU's SFX link for full text |
Yes | Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes | Yes | |
| Output |
||||||||
| Create bibliographies | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No*** |
No*** |
Yes |
|
| Create footnotes, in-text references | Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No*** |
No*** | Yes |
|
| Sharing |
||||||||
| Share access to program with others | Yes | No | Yes |
No |
Yes | Yes | No |
|
| Tag items for discussion |
No | No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes | No |
|
| Generate RSS feeds from references |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
| Ease of Use (1 easy - 5 hard) |
3 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
|
* EndNote Web adds many online features to the EndNote desktop application, but may be used alone.
** NYU Libraries licenses the use of RefWorks for NYU students and faculty.
